On Duterte’s another martial law extension

It has now come to pass that Amboy Duterte will extend martial law in Mindanao for another year after falling flat on his face on his “revolutionary government” and federalist ambitions. He has resorted to calling on his minions in congress to grant him and his military cabal a full year of martial rule to carry out his triple wars of suppression.

That this will result in unmitigated death and destruction goes without saying. That this came after his declaration of the CPP and NPA as terrorists and simple criminals and his unbridled hostility to the legal democratic movement, speaks loudly and clearly of his intention to impose nationwide martial law. With barely concealed steps, Duterte is setting up his fascist dictatorship to perpetuate himself in power.

The people and the revolutionary movement are ready to defend themselves and will meet him head-on.

Topics: Mindanao , #US-Duterte , #MartialLawExtension

Latest statements

Padulong sa iyang pagkahugno ang pintas-sa-kababayen-ang diktador nga si Rodrigo Duterte Duterte’s war against Lumad intensifies in Southern Mindanao, NPA launches counter-attacks Rodrigo Duterte is a misogynistic tyrrant on his way to his downfall Nagkamangtas ang gyera ni Duterte batuk sa Lumad sa Southern Mindanao, kontra-atake gilunsad sa NPA 6 na elemento ng PNP-SAF sa Antipolo City, sugatan sa pananambang ng NPA-Rizal! Pagbati ng MGC sa opensibang militar NPA Rizal P25,000 bounty sa bawat Pulang mandirigma, desperadong hakbang ni Duterte

Other statements by the Information Bureau, Communist Party of the Philippines

On the so-called NPA surrenderees Labanan at biguin ang teroristang lagim ng rehimeng US-Duterte Resist and frustrate the US-Duterte regime’s reign of terror Magkasunod na TO sagot ng BHB sa Pasismo ng 50IB On the AFP’s lies regarding the supposed NPA attack on AFP troops in a “relief mission” in Samar Quid pro quo: Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines in exchange for support to Duterte’s corrupt and criminal rule NPA to Duterte: No, thanks
Back to statements